Why it’s so hard to get schools online in the digital age

In recent months there’s been a lot of news about public, private and philanthropic commitments to getting our public schools access to broadband Internet. In February, coming off a State of the Union address by President Obama that highlighted the issue, the FCC announced that it would move money around to double the sum available for so-called E-Rate broadband grants, from $1 to $2 billion. According to the advocacy group Education Superhighway, an astonishing 72% of K-12 schools nationwide lack sufficient speeds for the kinds of applications that you and I probably take for granted in our homes.

11807694926_8678fdc0f4_z

How can this be? The problems with school Internet access are basic and often come in the last mile, or even the last few inches. I recently spoke to Matt Tullman of digedu, a small Chicago-based startup, who offered me a closeup view of the problems.

Digedu actually started as a learning software company, offering lesson creation tools. They expanded into providing hardware, helping a school choose the right device and offering the service maintenance and training. It became clear that many schools didn’t have the bandwidth to use the products they were offering.

So they created a classroom “bandwidth augmentation” solution called Classroom Cloud. It’s a box that sits on a desk, makes local backups of content, and augments bandwidth, enabling 60 or 70 students to stream video simultaneously.

I asked how much his solution can improve performance for his client schools. “It’s not so much a difference in performance as operable vs. not,” he says. “Most schools share amongst the entire school what a household would have.”

Think about that: a connection that’s supposed to be used by 4 or 5 people, instead being shared by possibly hundreds of students.

Upgrading access, he says, is a heavy infrastructure undertaking, often bound up with other costs.

“In the Southside of Chicago, where our schools are located, it’s copper wires.  They have no other choice. It’s not about paying for a bigger plan. I sat down with a principal who told me, even if you use E-rate it’s still $200,000 to lay a pipe of fiber optics. That’s prohibitive, especially when access is not the end in itself–the outcome is technology.” In other words, laying the pipe is a necessary, not a sufficient condition to having a 21st century school.

Figuring out what exactly is slowing down a school’s connection takes some detective work–Tullman says he’s often “sweating in his suit” at un-air conditioned Chicago schools. 

“There are so many points at which bandwidth can be throttled at most schools,” Tullman says. “The access point could be outside these buildings with four-foot concrete walls. It could be several years old. The wiring could be old. You have to have a holistic view of what’s going on.” 

 The E-Rate program has been criticized for mismanagement of resources. A very large proportion, about five billion dollars’ worth, of E-Rate funds has gone unused, piling up year after year. Outdated procurement processes also stand in the way of school districts using these funds effectively. According to Education Superhighway, average schools are paying around $25 per mbps (megabit per second), while some districts have been able to negotiate prices as low as $2 per mbps. (According to the FCC, minimum bandwidth for one user to download email or browse static web pages is about 0.5 mbps.  “Advanced” service is classified as more than 15 mbps, which is needed to have more than three users or devices using applications such as streaming video.) 


Education Superhighway recommends school districts banding together into regional consortia to increase their bargaining power. 
Maybe the structure of the federal grant program needs to change to enable the kind of last-few-inches construction and network management that actually needs to be done to get schools wired.

Update: this post has been updated to reflect the correct term “megabit per second.”


POSTED BY Anya Kamenetz ON March 13, 2014

Comments & Trackbacks (9) | Post a Comment

Douglas Levin

Do you have a citation for “In each of the past several years, between half a billion and a billion dollars’ worth of E-Rate funds have gone unused.” That is a significant claim in the scope of the size of the program.

Anya Kamenetz
Douglas Levin

When the article you cite first came out, I also questioned the Washington Post reporter and never received a response. I have yet to see an official statement from the FCC or an independent study that verifies what appears to be hearsay. I’d certainly appreciate seeing an original citation or a fact check on that claim.

Anya Kamenetz

This is directly from FCC.gov – “Each funding year, a portion of E-rate funds remains unused”…
“unused funds…$850m from 2003-2009″ http://www.fcc.gov/document/school-and-libraries-universal-service-support-mechanismfunds-learning-llc-petition-reject-

Adam

What exactly is a “megawatt of bandwidth” and how many bandwidths can I buy for $9?

Anya Kamenetz

thanks for the note! I updated this to make sense.

tlbradley

I’m network administrator for a school district and as such I’m a supporter of increased bandwidth for schools — but I have to wince everytime I hear that “hundreds of users on a connection the same size as a home connection”. Unless a school has made a really poor choice in ISP, they are using a business class connection which makes comparisons apples vs oranges against a consumer home connection. The former has Qos, is a symmetrical connection, and is dedicated bandwidth with a committed rate. Consumer connections have none of the above and are “best effort”. Today I measured 22 megs of bandwidth being utilized by 312 students streaming High Def youtube videos. As the old saying go, Kids, don’t try this at home ……

Anya Kamenetz

Maybe we could chat further about this? I would love to hear more about your experience…

Your email is never published nor shared.

Required
Required
CAPTCHA Image